Next: Eigenfunctions
Up: Eigenvalue problem for Rayleigh
Previous: Eigenvalue problem for Rayleigh
Contents
In a vertically heterogeneous, isotropic and elastic medium occupying a half-space, a
wave travelling along X axis generates displacements along X and Z axis of the form
where
,
and
are the radial, transversal and vertical components, respectively,
and
are the complex amplitudes (including phase shifts between components),
is the angular frequency, and
is the velocity of Rayleigh waves (m/s). A motion-stress vector for Rayleigh waves is defined in a similar way as for Love case (section 3.1.3).
 |
(3.25) |
where,
is the amplitude of the vertical compression stress
and
is the amplitude of the radial shear stress
.
From equation of motion (3.9), the solution must satisfy the following differential equation:
 |
(3.27) |
where
is the density,
and
are Lamé moduli. The
dependencies of
,
and
have been dropped for simplicity. For surface waves, the boundary conditions require that:
| |
|
 |
(3.28) |
| |
|
 |
(3.29) |
Similarly to Love case, the equation of motion is reduced to an equation of the same form as equation (3.1). The solution for the motion-stress vector is given by equation (3.5). The constraint on the motion-stress at infinity is transformed into a radiation condition that no up-going waves are found in the bottom half-space. For
plane waves, the amplitudes of downgoing (
and
for P and S-waves, respectively) and up going (
and
for P and S-waves, respectively) waves traveling across an homogeneous half space are function of the motion-stress vector at the top of the half space (
) (Aki and Richards (2002); Dunkin (1965)). The motion-stress vector is propagated to
by the means of equation (3.5). The subscript
is added to all parameters defined for layer
.
 |
(3.30) |
where,
 |
(3.31) |
where,
,
is the velocity of P waves (m/s),
,
is the velocity of S waves (m/s),
,
is the rigidity, and
is the density (t/m
).
Merging boundary conditions with equation (3.30),
This equation is always true when the sub-determinant
vanishes. Like in the Love case, the problem of finding the dispersion curves is thus reduced to a root search along the slowness or the velocity axis for a given frequency. However as stated by Dunkin (1965), the terms of the sub-determinant can become very large. Subtracting two large numbers results in a loss of significant digits, which implies the use of very high precision computations (e.g. 128 bit numbers or even more whereas computers are classically limited to 32 or 64 bits). Hence, Dunkin proposed an alternative way of propagating motion-stress vector by the means of the following theorem. If
then
 |
(3.33) |
where
is the second order sub-determinant of matrix P. The notation
is also used in appendix A.
In equation (3.33), the summation rules3.1 apply for indices appearing two times like
and
. In this case, the summed pairs of indices are to be only distinct pairs of distinct indices3.2 (by convention,
,
,...,
,
). It follows from equation (3.33) that:
With the condition on indices, the factor
has 6 components: 12, 13, 14, 23, 24 and 34 (Dunkin (1965)). On the other hand,
has 6x6 components. Hence, like in the Love case, for a given frequency (
), only a few discrete values are possible for the velocity of the Rayleigh surface wave (
), corresponding to the dispersion curves of various modes. The dispersion curve is found by seeking the roots of
.
Next: Eigenfunctions
Up: Eigenvalue problem for Rayleigh
Previous: Eigenvalue problem for Rayleigh
Contents
2007-03-15